•  
  •  
 

UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law

Abstract

2010 sees the three hundredth anniversary of the U.K.'s Statute of Anne 1710. This paper suggests that with the increased ability of content recipients to re-use works, there is a need to readdress the concerns of stakeholders, namely authors, publishers and content recipients. The paper sets out in detail how this should be achieved. To do so, it utilises the notion of creativity as the benchmark by which to balance the interests of stakeholders. This has been used in early eighteenth century case law in the U.K., and there are also other historical and theoretical justifications. The paper then proceeds to propose two new complementary systems. Purchase of the original work is to be required where the later work is quantitatively substantially similar to the original, and where a work is not quantitatively substantially similar, a system of compulsory licensing is to be instituted. The law will also provide a positive right to content recipients to make copies, and, in certain circumstances, a positive right to access technologically protected works.

Share

COinS