Conversations said in public do not have an expectation of privacy, and therefore, the ShotSpotter does not violate the right to privacy. This comment will address the following: a) ShotSpotter technology is a necessity in all neighborhoods; b) ShotSpotter does not violate an individual’s expectation of privacy; c) the need for ShotSpotter outweighs the cost of the device; and e) regulations and economic solutions will allow cities to use ShotSpotter while still protecting the individual’s privacy rights.
Amanda Busljeta, How an Acoustic Sensor Can Catch a Gunman, 32 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 211 (2016)
Computer Law Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Internet Law Commons, Law and Society Commons, Privacy Law Commons, Science and Technology Law Commons, Second Amendment Commons, State and Local Government Law Commons