Coerced Testimony of a Witness, As Opposed to the Fabrication of Evidence, Should Not Be Used as a Basis to Satisfy a § 1983 Claim for Alleged Due Process Violations in an Underlying Criminal Matter, 55 UIC L. Rev. 40 (2022)

Authors

Jonathan Federman
Kyle Fleck

Recommended Citation

Jonathan L. Federman & Kyle Fleck, Coerced Testimony of a Witness, As Opposed to the Fabrication of Evidence, Should Not Be Used as a Basis to Satisfy a § 1983 Claim for Alleged Due Process Violations in an Underlying Criminal Matter, 55 UIC L. Rev. 40 (2022)