UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law | Vol 1 | Iss 1

Skip to main content

Home > RIPL > Vol. 1 > Iss. 1 (2001)

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

Fall 2001

Articles

At Sea in a Black Box: Charting a Clearer Course for Juries Through the Perilous Straits of Patent Invalidity, 1 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 3 (2001)
Janice M. Mueller

When a Patent Claim is Broader Than the Disclosure: The Federal Circuit's Game Has No Rules, 1 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 21 (2001)
Robert L. Harmon

Remedies for Patent Infringement: A Comparative Study of U.S. and Chinese Law, 1 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 35 (2001)
Guangliang Zhang

Festo: A Jurisprudential Test for the Supreme Court?, 1 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 69 (2001)
James E. Hopenfeld

Comments

The California Gold Rush and the Model Rules: Do the Prospectors Have Sufficient Guidance?, 1 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 109 (2001)
Tony Goodman

The Inherent Limitations Doctrine: How the Specification May Inherently Limit the Scope of the Claims, 1 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 124 (2001)
Adam G. Kelly

The USPTO's New Utility Guidelines: Will They Be Enough to Secure Patent Protection in Biotech?, 1 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 142 (2001)
Anna E. Morrison

Rock and Roll Royalties, Copyrights and Contracts of Adhesion: Why Musicians May Be Chasing Waterfalls, 1 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 163 (2001)
Starr Nelson

Foreword

Founding a New Journal in the Age of Electronic Law, 1 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 1 (2001)
Paul R. Michel