Home > RIPL > Vol. 15 > Iss. 3 (2016)
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Article Title
Abstract
The historical conditions under which indigenous (and specifically Native American) cultural heritage objects have been collected present tremendous difficulties, since collecting efforts were frequently influenced, or even directed, by racist or colonialist ideologies. Recent decades have seen efforts to redress past wrongs, as well as to correct misunderstandings and misrepresentations. The restitution and repatriation processes of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 1990, enacted as human rights legislation, provide powerful, but imperfect tools for the protection of Native American cultural heritage. The challenges are both domestic and international. Recent French auction sales of Hopi, Zuni, and Navajo sacred objects highlight the limitations of the available legal tools. But NAGPRA’s limitations do not only manifest in its lack of extraterritorial effect. Even domestically, courts have often interpreted NAGPRA restrictively, with little understanding of Native American cultures.
Recommended Citation
Kevin P. Ray, NAGPRA and Its Limitations: Repatriation of Indigenous Cultural Heritage, 15 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 472 (2016)
Included in
Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Cultural Heritage Law Commons, Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law Commons, Intellectual Property Law Commons, International Law Commons, Law and Society Commons, Science and Technology Law Commons