UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law | Vol 17 | Iss 2

Skip to main content

Home > RIPL > Vol. 17 > Iss. 2 (2017)

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

Articles

Write Like a Patent Litigator: Avoid Common Mistakes Made by Non-Patent Lawyers, 17 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 141 (2017)
Ted L. Field

Samsung v. Apple, Life Technologies v. Promega, SCA Hygiene Products v. First Quality Baby Products, TC Heartland v. Kraft, Impression Products v. Lexmark, and Sandoz v. Amgen: The U.S. Supreme Court Decides Six Patent Cases in 2016-17, 17 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 162 (2017)
Sue Ann Ganske

Avoiding the Rabbit Hole: An Ontological Model for Determining Section 101 Patent-Eligibility under Alice, 17 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 192 (2017)
Alan J. Gocha

Traditional Knowledge Digital Library: "A Silver Bullet" in the War against Biopiracy?, 17 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 214 (2017)
Seemantani Sharma

TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands and the Big Debate About East Texas: How a Delaware Case Leaves Patent Venue Unsettled and Presages As Applied Challenges to the Constitutionality of Narrow Venue Interpretations, 17 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 232 (2017)
Jesse Snyder

Comments

If the Shoe Fits: The Effects of a Uniform Copyright Design Test on Local Fashion Designers, 17 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 262 (2017)
Elise Ruff

Avoiding the Chaos of Maryjane - A Conventional Approach to Intellectual Property Protection of Marijuana, 17 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 278 (2017)
Kaylee Willis