Skip to main content

Home > ripl > Vol. 8 > Iss. 3 (2009)

Volume 8 (2008-2009), Issue 3 (2009) Spring 2009

Articles

Patent Reform Should Not Leave Innovation Behind, 8 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 328 (2009)
Carl E. Gulbrandsen, Stephanie Adamany, Sandra Haberny, and Jason Sheasby

The New "Extra-Ordinary" Observer Test For Design Patent Infringement–On A Crash Course With The Supreme Court's Precedent in Gorham v. White, 8 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 354 (2009)
Christopher V. Carani

United States Reexamination Procedures: Recent Trends, Strategies and Impact on Patent Practice, 8 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 381 (2009)
Greg H. Gardella and Emily A. Berger

Comments

Do As We Say, Not As We Do: A Study of the Well-Known Marks Doctrine in the United States, 8 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 412 (2009)
Andrew M. Cook

Fender Bender: 3D Computer Modeling of Commercial Objects and the Meshwerks v. Toyota Decision, 8 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 429 (2009)
Andrew C. Landsman

Proveris Scientific Corp. v. Innovasystems, Inc. Sinks Safe Harbor Protection For Research Tools, 8 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 452 (2009)
Erin M. McKibben