Skip to main content

Home > RIPL > Vol. 3 > Iss. 1 (2003)

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

Fall 2003

Articles

Using Declaratory Judgments Offensively in Patent Cases - DJ Jive, 3 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 1 (2003)
Peter J. Shurn III

How the Supreme Court Decides to Review Intellectual Property Cases, 3 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 19 (2003)
Matthew M. Neumeier

Creative Claim Drafting: Claim Drafting Strategies, Specification Preparation, and Prosecution Tactics, 3 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 34 (2003)
George F. Wheeler

Navigating the Bankruptcy Waters in a Domain Name Rowboat, 3 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 61 (2003)
Beverly A. Berneman

Protecting the Rights of Indigenous Cultures Under the Current Intellectual Property System: Is it a Good Idea?, 3 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 88 (2003)
Juan Andrés Fuentes

Is the Experimental Use Exemption for Patent Infringement Still Needed?, 3 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 103 (2003)
Melanie K. Kitzan Haindfield

Comments

“You Said What?”: A Look at the Influence of Foreign Patent Prosecution on Domestic Infringement Litigation, 3 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 119 (2003)
Brian R. Cheslek

The Rambus Shell Game: A Lack of Integrity In the Standards Setting Process, 3 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 138 (2003)
David Adam Dorth

Making A Pitch for Extending A Judge's Power to Determine Obviousness: How The McGinley Court Struck Out, 3 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 156 (2003)
John Petravich