Skip to main content

Home > RIPL > Vol. 3 > Iss. 2 (2004)

UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law

Spring 2004

Articles

"Distinctive" and "Famous" - Separate Requirements Under the Federal Trademark Dilution Act?, 3 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 174 (2004)
M. Scott Donahey

The Inequitable Conduct Defense Lives On: 2003 Federal Circuit Decisions and Their Impact, 3 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 189 (2004)
Alan M. Kowalchyk and Thomas R. Johnson

Commentary: Willful Patent Infringement and the Federal Circuit's Pending En Banc Decision in Knorr-Bremse v. Dana Corp., 3 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 218 (2004)
Janice M. Mueller

Developments in Patent Law 2003, 3 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 229 (2004)
Bradley C. Wright

Recent Developments in Trademark Law: The Ongoing Refinement of Rights, 3 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 258 (2004)
Chad Doellinger

Comments

“Shamnesty” vs. Amnesty: Can the RIAA Grant Immunity to File-Sharers from Copyright Infringement Lawsuits?, 3 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 279 (2004)
Natosha Cuyler-Sherman

“Intellectual Alchemy”: Securitization of Intellectual Property as an Innovative Form of Alternative Financing, 3 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 307 (2004)
John M. Gabala Jr.

What a Long, Strange “TRIPS” it’s Been: Compulsory Licensing from the Adoption of TRIPS to the Agreement on Implementation of the Doha Declaration, 3 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 331 (2004)
Mark C. Lang

Dividing the (Statutory) Baby Under Anton/Bauer: Using the Doctrine of Implied License to Circumvent § 271(c) Protection for Components of a Patented Combination, 3 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 355 (2004)
Daniel M. Lechleiter