Did the Fifth Circuit Apply an Unduly Burdensome Standard When It Denied a Certificate of Appealability on a Motion to Reopen a Judgment and Obtain Merits Review on a Claim That Trial Counsel was Constitutionally Ineffective for Knowingly Presenting an Expert Who Testified the Defendant Was Likely to Be Dangerous in the Future because of His Race: Buck v. Davis
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2016
Recommended Citation
Steven D. Schwinn, Did the Fifth Circuit Apply an Unduly Burdensome Standard When It Denied a Certificate of Appealability on a Motion to Reopen a Judgment and Obtain Merits Review on a Claim That Trial Counsel was Constitutionally Ineffective for Knowingly Presenting an Expert Who Testified the Defendant Was Likely to Be Dangerous in the Future because of His Race: Buck v. Davis (15-8049), 44 Preview of U.S. Sup. Ct. Cases 16 (2016)
COinS
